So, I was cancelled again, which seems like a reoccurring theme every time I try to publish something in the United Kingdom, or anything that points to failures in academia. My paper concerning the problematic nature of Prostasia was published by the British Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and History after peer review, but was removed the next day after Prostasia threatened the Journal. Not only does this behaviour ironically, prove my findings but has amplified the issue via the Streisand Effect after being covered by Reduxx and the Post Millennial.
I have since found another Journal that has a spine (pun intended) and republished the paper which is free for everyone to read.
READ HERE
I recommend this paper not just as a debunking of any validity on the part of Prostasia but even more so to equip the public with knowledge of how paedophiles hide behind pseudo-academic jargon in order to justify their debased ideas.
Academia unfortunately has a long history of either turning a blind eye or outright endorsing paedophilic deviancy via an international network of organisations and individuals spanning decades.
A NOTE TO PARENTS: Data on Prostasia members have identified individuals working in a number of fields including social welfare and education even including librarians, some of whom have or have had access to very young children. Members were profiled to come from a very wide array of countries including, the USA, the UK, Australia, Brazil, Germany, Russia, and Spain among others. I urge all parents to know who has contact with their children, especially who their teachers and coaches are. Parents you are the first and often the only line of defence.
I recommend that since this is heavy reading, that it may not be easy for those who have suffered from abuse as children to read, hence reader discretion is advised. Some minor changes have been made from the original which I will leave up for cross comparison if desired.
READ HERE
I recommend this paper not just as a debunking of any validity on the part of Prostasia but even more so to equip the public with knowledge of how paedophiles hide behind pseudo-academic jargon in order to justify their debased ideas.
Academia unfortunately has a long history of either turning a blind eye or outright endorsing paedophilic deviancy via an international network of organisations and individuals spanning decades.
A NOTE TO PARENTS: Data on Prostasia members have identified individuals working in a number of fields including social welfare and education even including librarians, some of whom have or have had access to very young children. Members were profiled to come from a very wide array of countries including, the USA, the UK, Australia, Brazil, Germany, Russia, and Spain among others. I urge all parents to know who has contact with their children, especially who their teachers and coaches are. Parents you are the first and often the only line of defence.
I recommend that since this is heavy reading, that it may not be easy for those who have suffered from abuse as children to read, hence reader discretion is advised. Some minor changes have been made from the original which I will leave up for cross comparison if desired.
Original Journal Article
| social_linguistic_analysis.pdf |
